Although business challenges continue to evolve for airlines, they still center on the need to increase profits, productivity, and responsiveness to market changes while also improving customer experience. Nearly four decades ago, American Airlines launched the revenue management revolution with its yield management strategy.
This was an approach based on the fundamental premise that inventory was perishable and all customers were not created equal. The carrier focused on maximizing revenue through an analytics-based inventory methodology in an effort to thwart an increasing threat in the market at that time — the advent of the low-cost, low-fare carrier.
By coupling this inventory-management approach with an innovative variable pricing strategy based on understanding, anticipating and influencing customer behavior, American Airlines was able to maximize its revenue and profits from a perishable resource airline seats and compete directly with low-cost carriers LCCs. This methodology rapidly spread throughout the airline industry.
This significant change has orchestrated customer demands and expectations for lower fares. These two factors have largely resulted in a commoditization of base fares, leaving airlines to focus their efforts on identifying and managing new opportunities to grow revenue, profit, and productivity, and further differentiate their brands in the marketplace.
The evolution of airline revenue management: Defining the next generation approach
The outcome of their efforts has identified new opportunities for airlines to further increase employee productivity and revenue expansion.
For example, having access to an easy-to-use, consumer-grade user experience coupled with seamless inventory and revenue management business processes can drive productivity improvements for airlines. By optimizing all available revenue streams, including those from partnerships, codeshares, and alliances, ancillary sales, merchandising, fees and taxes, new possibilities will become available that will lead to subsequent financial gains for airlines.
To support these emerging opportunities, a next-generation revenue management solution is essential. These obstacles encompass the familiar areas of increasing profits, evolving distribution models, interpreting volumes of unstructured data and the need to offer a more personalized customer experience.
Airlines are now tasked with efficiently collecting, processing and analyzing this data and subsequently using it to sense and respond to shifting market dynamics. And customer demand for a seamless personalized travel experience continues to increase while airlines attempt to implement an integrated customer-centric business strategy that is aligned with revenue objectives.
To ensure future success, airlines need a fresh approach that focuses on revenue per customer rather than revenue per seat and provides the means to incorporate operational efficiencies into their business processes. In addition, it should encompass readily accessible, real-time information that will improve retailing and customer-centricity strategies while overcoming competitive influences in the marketplace.
To accomplish this, airlines need to incorporate a next-generation revenue management solution that goes above and beyond just the management of seat revenue. The solution must provide airlines with a much broader view of revenue data at the customer level, presenting information in real-time with an enhanced user interface that is broadly integrated across sales and service tools, including those supporting inventory and dynamic pricing.
In essence, airlines must become better retailers. In doing so, they will begin to understand the principles and value of total revenue optimization TRO. TRO ensures revenue-management solutions consider the total value of each potential customer versus the value of the base fare. By embracing a TRO approach to support ancillary revenue management alone, revenue gains between.
Airlines are moving beyond traditional partnership models, developing equity partnerships where costs are shared and cooperation includes joint inventory and optimized revenue management of capacity. However, their inability to make accurate revenue management decisions due to the lack of data available from partners leads to inaccurate forecasting models and diminished revenue returns.
In addition, newer revenue sources such as baggage, premium seating and other ancillary fees are managed manually or without significant automation, as limited technology has been available to drive forecasting and optimization.
Ancillary revenues grew A next-generation revenue management solution that uses a complete view of total passenger value, as well as network partner data, is required for an airline to have real-time insight into total revenue for every flight, every market, and every departure date. Such a solution provides accurate, up-to-the-minute forecasting and optimization logic for each market that incorporates the potential revenue impact from the vast array of codeshare, partnership, and ancillary options.
The emergence of an on-demand economy has altered the way information is used to make accurate and timely business decisions. Airlines that do not have access to real-time, actionable data are delayed in their decision-making, resulting in, uncompetitive product offerings, lost revenue and decreased market share. One strategic area of focus for airlines today is the synchronization of their systems throughout their operations.
The result is lower total revenue, lost market share and uncompetitive product offerings. Integration is playing a heightened role in revenue management. Revenue-management processes rely on the inherent capabilities of an integrated system to manage all business rules impacting availability and eliminate potential conflicts. A best-in-class, next-generation revenue-management system supported by seamless inventory and business-process integration can increase airlines revenues by over 1.The primary aim of revenue management RM is to sell the right product to the right customer at the right time for the right price.
Ever since the deregulation of US airline industry, and the emergence of the internet as a distribution channel, RM has come of age. The purpose of this paper is to map out ten turning points in the evolution of Revenue Management taking an historical perspective. The paper is a chronological account based upon published research and literature fundamentally drawn from the Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management.
The originality of the paper lies in identifying the core trends or turning points that have shaped the development of RM thus assisting futurists or forecasters to shape the future. Yeoman, I. Published in the Journal of Tourism Futures. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article for both commercial and non-commercial purposessubject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The primary aim of Revenue Management RM is selling the right product to the right customer at the right time for the right price.
Ever since the deregulation of airline industry in the USA, and the emergence of the internet as a distribution channel, RM has come of age and is a topic of importance in tourism, hospitality and services management. Taking an historical perspective, this paper maps out ten turning points in the evolution of RM. Futurists, therefore, look to the past as a representation of the future. Indeed, Luhmann noted that the history of the future does not reach back very far in the terms of human activity compared to the creation of the Planet Earth.
Technological advancement within this context has an even shorter history and RM is a phenomena of the twenty-first century Yeoman, The earliest description of forecasting models can be found in passenger bookings and cancellation models Beckmann and Bobkoski, ; Weatherford, ; Yeoman and McMahon-Beattie, The opportunity to develop an algorithm to address revenue maximization was linked to technological developments with the introduction of a sophisticated computer reservations system at the British Overseas Airways Corporation.
The significance was that Littlewood was the first to propose aggregating flights from low-demand original and destination in broader categories, i. EMSRb is based on an approximation that compares two classes but it does take the statistical averaging effect into account. Instead of aggregating protection levels, as EMSRa does, it aggregates demand.
According to Vinodyield management came into existence on a significant scale after the deregulation of the US airline industry.
Button notes that the US Domestic Airline Deregulation Act was a dramatic event in the US economic policy, dismantling the comprehensive system of government controls. For example, before deregulation, airlines operated in tightly regulated environments in which Civil Aeronautics Board CAB approved routes and set fares guaranteed airlines a 12 per cent return on flights that were 55 per cent full.
After deregulation, there was an explosion of fares offered by competing airlines. Indeed, between andaverage fares for US domestic passengers fell by 30 per cent in real terms.
One of the new carriers entering this deregulated market was PEOPLExpress and it threatened the existence of American Airlines with deeply discounted tickets.
For the first time, YM analysts at American Airlines were able to explicitly control the availability of the deeply discounted fares.
PEOPLExpress responded with further discounts, which were unsustainable thus forcing them out of business. The fare structure of a network carrier usually differentiates by market point of sale and is non-addictive in the sense that a ticket for the connecting itinerary A-B-C is cheaper than the sum of the tickets for A-B and B-C in that booking class.
The problem of leg control is that it cannot distinguish between local and connecting traffic in availability control.So, the Asia connections get mapped into the highest fare classes on the New Orleans-to-Dallas leg, the Des Moines connections into intermediate fare classes and the local fares into the lower fare classes.
This results in saving seats for the longer haul connections over local passengers. In fact, if the Asia connect fares are mapped higher, then the airline could neglect the value of two locals. Often, the sum of two locals is higher total revenue than the connect passenger. One airline I worked with enjoyed tremendous demand on its Bangkok flights — literally full every day.
Filling up certain feeder flights with BKK passengers would block out two locals higher total revenue and keep the feeder flight from accommodating other high value connect passengers to other parts of the network. In this example, the airline might prefer to map BKK passengers into fare classes lower than Shanghai passengers — despite potentially lower absolute fares for SHA.
It is quite complicated to develop the optimal hierarchy across the network. Thus, the BKK connect passenger determined to be of lower value into the main hub, could be accommodated over an alternative and lower demand hub. Unfortunately, this is not the norm. Solutions Financial. Previous Post Next Post. See Related Posts. Follow us for daily updates. Subscribe to our blog.New pressures — like skyrocketing passenger expectations — are forcing carriers to refine their strategies.
Aircraft receive heavy maintenance checks. Flight crews undergo regular line reviews. Competition, globally, between airlines, with multiple business models and products, coupled with the rapid changes in market and competitive growth, requires that pricing and inventory management are optimized and respond quickly to change in the marketplace to achieve financial success. In the early s, the first major wave of low-cost carriers LCC entered the aviation market.
For passengers, these carriers offered unprecedented convenience and lower fares; for major carriers, though, the entrance forced a monumental shift. To keep up with their cheaper competitors and preserve long-term relationships with customers, major carriers would need to figure out a seemingly impossible equation: how to stay competitive with the LCCs and still get passengers to pay the highest possible price. The carriers designed an approach to revenue management that could increase total passenger revenue by applying various analytical techniques to forecast demand at various prices and optimize the sales mix of lower-fare and higher-fare passengers.
The strategy paid off. For instance, intermediary booking resources e. Selling too many low-priced seats to passengers otherwise willing to pay a lot more could dilute overall profits. Even the largest and most sophisticated of airlines can find that the most effective PRM practices have eroded over time.
So, two-thirds of our flights are getting hand-managed. Effective PRM practices are supported by three separate but equally important pillars: people and process, technology, and strategy. And while nearly all airlines maintain some sort of PRM effort, most focus too much on one pillar or another — instead of considering how all three need to work in concert.
On the flip side, an airline may invest in a well-qualified and continually trained workforce, but underinvest in the technology and select a cheaper alternative that does not provide all of the features needed by the airline. At best, this cutting edge technology will go unused; at worst, it will be applied in a faulty and likely costly manner.
Even in departments with appropriate technology and well-trained, skilled staff, hurdles like insufficient process controls, inadequate feedback loops, and inconsistent reporting and execution standards can short-circuit comprehensive PRM approaches.
Different analysts may work the same market situation in different ways, with different goals in mind, thus achieve significantly different results.
Revenue management software systems are specifically designed to manage the high volume of forecasting and optimization required to maximize unit revenues in a near real time environment. Here are a few questions airlines should be asking to make sure they have all of the pieces in place. From establishing basic KPIs to monitor performance to having playbooks on how to handle new developments internally and from competitors, whether it involves a change in frequencies, launch of a brand new market, or even an entire change in strategy such as the launch of basic economy fares.
Further, as the airline industry becomes ever-intertwined around the globe, the passenger and financial impact of codeshare, alliance, and joint ventures must be evaluated to ensure continued positive contribution for each participant.
What are other components of pricing and revenue management that have optimized unit revenue production? Let us know on Facebook or LinkedIn. A statement on social injustice. Click to read more. By Austin Horowitz. Austin Horowitz. Austin Horowitz's Recent Articles. Apr 11, Obtaining the Full Benefits of PRM: Questions Carriers Need to Ask Revenue management software systems are specifically designed to manage the high volume of forecasting and optimization required to maximize unit revenues in a near real time environment.
Key Questions. How effective are our management reports?To browse Academia. Skip to main content. Log In Sign Up. Download Free PDF. Airline Revenue Management. Nanda Piersma. Kevin Pak. Although revenue management has seen many new applications throughout the years, the main focus of research continues to be the airline industry. Ever since Littlewood first proposed a solution method for the airline revenue management problem, a variety of solution methods have been introduced.
In this paper we will give an overview of the solution methods presented throughout the literature. Introduction 1.
Revenue Management Companies selling perishable goods or services often face the problem of selling a fixed capacity of a product over a finite horizon. If the market is characterized by customers willing to pay different prices for the product, it is often possible to target different customer segments by the use of product differentiation. This creates the opportunity to sell the product to different customer segments for different prices, e.
In order to do so, decisions will have to be made about the prices to charge and the number of products to reserve for each customer segment. Making this kind of decisions is the topic of revenue management. Revenue management can be defined as the art of maximizing profit generated from a limited capacity of a product over a finite horizon by selling each product to the right customer at the right time for the right price.
It encompasses practices such as price-discrimination and turning down customers in anticipation of other, more profitable customers. Revenue management originates from the airline industry, where deregulation of the fares in the 's led to heavy competition and the opportunities for revenue management schemes were acknowledged in an early stage. The airline revenue management problem has received a lot of attention throughout the years and continues to be of interest to this day.
Other applications of revenue management can be found in the hotel, car rental, railway and cruise-line industries among others.
The possible applications of revenue management go beyond the tourist industries, though.
The energy and television broadcast industries have been mentioned as possible applications and it has been argued that the concept of revenue management can even be applied to fast moving consumer goods in supermarkets.
Airline Revenue Management An airline, typically, offers tickets for many origin-destination itineraries in various fare classes. Therefore the seats on a flight are products which can be offered to different customer segments for different prices. Since the tickets for a flight have to be sold before the plane takes off, the product is perishable and revenue management can be applied. At the heart of airline revenue management lies the seat inventory control problem.
This problem concerns the allocation of the finite seat inventory to the demand that occurs over time before the flight is scheduled to depart. The objective is to find the right combination of passengers on the flights such that revenues are maximized.
The optimal allocation of the seat inventory then has to be translated into a booking control policy, which determines whether or not to accept a booking request when it arrives. It is possible that at a certain point in time it is more profitable to reject a booking request in order to be able to accept a booking request of another passenger at a later point in time. Other important topics that have received attention in the revenue management literature are demand forecasting, overbooking and pricing.
Demand forecasting is of critical importance in airline revenue management because booking control policies make use of demand forecasts to determine the optimal booking control strategy. If an airline uses poor demand estimates, this will result in a booking control strategy which performs badly. Airlines often have to cope with no-shows, cancellations and denied boardings.
Therefore, in order to prevent a flight from taking off with vacant seats, airlines tend to overbook a flight. This means that the airline books more passengers on a flight than the capacity of the plane allows. The level of overbooking for each type of passenger has been the topic of research for many years. Pricing is obviously very important for the revenues of an airline company.
In fact, price differentiation is the starting point of the revenue management concept.The answer is no. Now, for most airlines, revenue management is not a competitive advantage. Instead, airline revenue management should in fact be used to implement the defined corporate strategy.
On the other hand, revenue management is an important tool for validating the overall airline strategy. Since its principal role is to allocate demand over scarce capacity, revenue management is constantly monitoring demand. American Airlines has the largest schedule in DFW — and expects to gain a share premium from Dallas-based passengers.
Allegiant Air offers mostly a low-frequency service to smaller, under-served communities. Virgin America and jetBlue are among the best known U. They both strive to offset the schedule advantages of their much larger competitors with a unique customer experience.
Spirit Airlines and Allegiant Air both have a greater focus on ancillary than other airlines. Spirit Airline strives to reduce the base fare and use ancillary pricing to gain high total revenue. Revenue management at each of these airlines should see demand consistent with corporate goals as generated by other functions that drive demand schedules, customer experience, sales, marketing, etc.
In addition to validating corporate strategy, revenue management is a tool for the implementation of strategy. The function must ensure successful coherence with airline-wide business priorities, and this alignment comes in many forms:.
Revenue management is designed to prioritize passengers based on fares and to give seats to the highest fare.
The turning points of revenue management: a brief history of future evolution
Greater availability for frequent flyers or for corporate customers are examples of strategic initiatives. A pure revenue maximization strategy can lead to even more market mayhem than the confusing airline pricing structure does already. When threatened by a new competitor, or when trying to gain a foothold in a new market, gaining market share may be more important than revenue maximization per the revenue management model. Maximizing revenue from the base fare - as done in most airline revenue management systems - would potentially conflict with the overall strategy of the airline.
Although cash flow is less a strategy than a tactical necessity for some airlines, revenue management must be in sync with the corporate direction on cash. Restricting sales in anticipation of future bookings may not meet the short-term cash needs of the airline.
Airline revenue management has become a strategic tool, not an effective strategy on its own. Solutions Financial.Dynamic weapons in the passing game.
Two-time Super Bowl winner at quarterback.Airline Revenue Management - Fare Products - Part 1
On paper, Big Blue looks like a good bet. Those two titles Eli won were behind power rushing attacks. Intriguing team with a hellish defense coming off a 12-4 AFC West title. Trusting either Tom Savage or rookie Deshaun Watson to lead the Texans to the promised land is like tossing money into a fire pit. Not that long ago the Cats were 17-1 and representing the NFC in the Super Bowl.
Cam Newton coming off a dreadful 2016 is eager to prove last year was a fluke. Toss in rookie Swiss Army Knife Christian McCaffery and a stout front seven, and there should be a significant level of interest. Especially at this price. If Atlanta regresses, look out. Young, talented team with a gunslinger at quarterback, a pair of playmaking receivers, and an attacking defense. The last two NFC champs came from the AFC South. Punting on either of these teams is worth considering at this price.
Why more airlines need to review their revenue management
Drew Brees knows time is running out on making another Super Bowl run. Perhaps the addition of Adrian Peterson will give the Saints the boost they need to overcome obvious defensive flaws. As for the Birds, nobody ever wins the NFC East in consecutive years, and the hype surrounding Carson Wentz seems to be legit.
If the Eagle defense can elevate to Top 10 level, it might be enough to carry them into January. Did you know prior to breaking his fibula in Week 16 last season, second-year quarterback Marcus Mariota had 26 touchdowns against only 9 interceptions. Did you know the Titans finished 3rd in rushing behind a rejuvenated DeMarco Murray and rookie Derrick Henry.
Did you know tight end Delanie Walker and wide receiver Rishard Matthews combined for 16 touchdowns. Did you know they signed Eric Decker who has scored double-digit touchdowns in three of the last five seasons. What does all this mean.
It means a Mariota vs Winston Super Bowl is forthcoming.